Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Spine / Re: V4.4 Thoughts
« Last post by KMorgan on 06-Aug-2008, 11:46:23 »
Jeff

How about a button that opens the NATS notam web page? Spine could then be the starting point for all the required actions.

I've obviously only used v4.4 a very few times but I find I am opening Spine, selecting Load, and then thinking - oops I need to update this file.  Then I go to IE, favourites, etc.  If there was a NATS button on the "source" panel it would be a handy shortcut.

Very glad Spine is back.

Keith
92
Spine / Re: V4.4 Thoughts
« Last post by KMorgan on 05-Aug-2008, 20:52:18 »
Jeff

Tried again paying more attention and the dates/times are correct.  Obviously went wrong somewhere first time round.

Really like the feature where the cursor on the plot brings up the applicable notam details on the main page.

Keith
93
Spine / Re: V4.4 Thoughts
« Last post by jeff on 05-Aug-2008, 19:34:08 »
Thanks Keith - I will summarise our email conversation below. It's good to get feedback regarding the changed layout.

Concerning your brief for the Scottish FIR: I chose an area brief, changed the "To" date from the 6th to the 8th, entered the FIR as EGPX and saved the result. I got the boundary dates in Spine as from 5th to 8th as expected.

So I am not sure what you did: if you just asked for the bog-standard EGPX FIR brief, then you'll only get the default 24-hour brief as there is no facility with that brief for changing the from and to dates/times. So I am not clear what the problem is. Perhaps I missed something.

There is no Spine server as such. When you run Spine on your computer, it checks the update area on my site to see if there is anything new program-wise to download, but that's it. Spine has the limited facility to download files from the internet: the pre-prepared 24-hour PIB is an example. It cannot log in to the site as they have made it a very complex procedure now (early versions of Spine did log in before the PIB became available - but it was a simple thing to do then).

Concerning our earlier email exchange: you commented that there seemed to be a problem with the Scope view excluding Aerodrome-only NOTAMs, but having them still included in the output. This was my response:

Quote
Actually, there are two bugs in there: a design bug and a crashing-type bug. For the second, deselect all scope views and you'll see what I mean.

The design bug is that I shouldn't have put view selection by scope in in the first place and I have ripped it out again in the next version. A view doesn't determine what goes into the output - it lets you see what part of the output you want to. So if you choose to view all included Notams, you should see just that, and not some of them additionally filtered by scope.

And yes, I can have just noticed that if you choose the Area brief, you can get Notams which are scope A only. I need to add an auto-delete feature for these when Aerodrome Notams are not selected in the Filter options.
94
Spine / V4.4 Thoughts
« Last post by KMorgan on 05-Aug-2008, 17:15:07 »
Jeff

As requested I'm replying on the forum.

I find the new layout much cleaner and it only takes a few seconds to rediscover the various options.

I think most people will use this like me.  Download an area or FIR brief so that all the notams are there then count on Spine to do the appropriate filtering.  Personally I only filter by range.  I like to quickly cast my eye over the autodeleted ones just in case.

I have loaded a Scottish FIR area brief for Friday 8 Aug and notice that the view from/until windows at the top still reflect the limited time span of the PIB download.  Does this mean that when using a personally generated brief the date/time is not being looked at?  I do appreciate that when using Spine in this way I am just using it as a viewer and should know what day it concerns.

Given that you have now arranged for an area or FIR brief to be parsed, is there perhaps a clever way for the Spine server to log itself into the NATS web site once per hour and generate itself a brief for the next three days?  Just a thought.

Keith
95
Spine / Re: Airfield Notams
« Last post by jeff on 03-Aug-2008, 10:49:09 »
V4.4 has just been released. This allows you to process NOTAM briefs saved from the AIS web site, as well as the quick download. The AIS briefs contain Aerodrome NOTAMs.

Jeff.
96
Spine / Re: Linking of map display to main display
« Last post by jeff on 03-Aug-2008, 10:46:15 »
This feature has been implemented in V4.4. Posting this here in case you are by chance monitoring this topic...
97
Spine / Re: Airfield Notams
« Last post by jeff on 01-Aug-2008, 23:06:55 »
I hope you find the program useful. As Spine was originally designed for use by glider pilots (and they remain the main audience), you may find some things not totally suitable for a GA pilot, though I have done my best with the Filter settings. If you find problems, or have suggestions for improvement, please feel free to post here.
98
Spine / Re: Airfield Notams
« Last post by alan.batchelor on 01-Aug-2008, 19:31:27 »
Jeff

The simple explanation is that when I came to choose my email address from BT internet, alan.batchelor already existed (I suspect from an earlier use by me of btinternet when it was a dial up facility), so I chose alandotbatchelor@XXXXX

I look forward to using Spine regularly. I particulartly like the graphics plot with major controlled airspace depicted - especially as my particular area is just to the east of the Stansted zone. I understand the French manage to report UK Notams in a much more readable form than the UK authorities manage, so I'm especially keen to see whether Spine can deliver what I need to know in a form which is easily assimilated.

very best regards

Alan Batchelor

edited full email address - Jeff

99
Spine / Re: Airfield Notams
« Last post by jeff on 01-Aug-2008, 14:29:53 »
You'll get automatic notification of an update either when you download the Notams, or you explicity click on "Check for Updates" (it checks before downloading). I have a few more changes to make, plus updating the help, then I will release.

I realized you must have got the confirmation email, but in your profile it says "alandotbatchelor..." instead of "alan.batchelor...". It's not the forum doing that, since someone else with a similar email address format has the "." there. Now I'm confused - I can only see one place in the profile where the email can be entered, and that must be valid. Oh well - that's software for you.
100
General Support and Discussion / MOVED: Airfield Notams
« Last post by jeff on 01-Aug-2008, 14:19:21 »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]